← Back to Toolkit

Enter Your Details

0
kg (average)

Using a Range Instead of a Single Number

Because no single formula is perfectly right, the four results together form a range — and that range is more honest than any one figure. All four formulas used in this calculator were developed in the 1970s and 1980s for different clinical and research purposes:

This calculator shows each formula's result so you can see the range and choose what makes sense for you.

Formulas: Hamwi (1964), Devine (1974), Robinson (1983), Miller (1983). Full methodology →

When 'Ideal' Ignores Your Muscle

Every ideal weight formula shares the same blind spot: they only use height and gender, and none of them knows what kind of body is attached to that height. They don't account for factors that significantly affect what a healthy weight actually looks like for you:

Use the formulas as a starting point, not a strict target.

Beyond the Numbers

The best measure of a healthy weight isn't a formula — it's how your body feels and functions. Focus on these health markers instead:

Our Body Fat Calculator and BMI Calculator can give you additional perspectives on your weight status.

Four Formulas, One Height: Why They Differ

Feed the same 170 cm (5'7") person into all four formulas and you get four different targets — the formulas disagree on purpose. Here's exactly what that looks like and when each one deserves the edge:

Formula170 cm Male170 cm FemaleWhen It's Preferred
Hamwi (1964)66.7 kg60.7 kgDietary planning and hospital nutrition
Devine (1974)65.9 kg61.4 kgMedication dosing (aminoglycosides, etc.)
Robinson (1983)65.2 kg60.8 kgInsurance-based longevity estimates
Miller (1983)66.0 kg62.5 kgClinical weight-range counseling

Notice how the four agree far more than they argue — the gap between the highest and lowest is only about 1.5 kg for men and 1.8 kg for women at this height. The differences are subtle but systematic: Hamwi and Miller start from slightly different frame baselines, while Devine's tuning comes from a drug-dosing study. When precision matters for medication, Devine is the reference standard; when you're setting a simple nutrition target, Hamwi is the friendlier choice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ideal weight formula wins for accuracy?
No single formula is considered the most accurate for everyone. Each formula (Hamwi, Devine, Robinson, Miller) was developed for different populations and clinical purposes. The Hamwi formula was created for dietary use, Devine for medication dosing, Robinson for insurance data, and Miller for clinical settings. The average of all four gives the best general estimate.
Do these formulas work for all body types?
These formulas are based solely on height and gender. They do not account for frame size, muscle mass, body composition, age, or ethnicity. A muscular person or someone with a larger frame may weigh more than their calculated ideal weight and still be perfectly healthy.
Weighing more than the chart — is that a problem?
Weighing more than your calculated ideal weight is not necessarily unhealthy. Muscle is denser than fat, so athletes and active individuals often weigh more. Focus on body composition, energy levels, and health markers rather than a single number on the scale.
Are these formulas different for children?
Yes, these formulas are designed for adults only. Children and adolescents use age-based growth charts (CDC or WHO percentiles) to assess healthy weight, as their bodies are still developing and growth patterns vary significantly by age.
How does age affect ideal weight?
These formulas do not account for age. In reality, metabolism slows with age, muscle mass tends to decrease, and body composition changes. Older adults may need to focus more on maintaining muscle mass than hitting a specific weight target.
Should I aim for the middle of the range?
Yes, the average of the four formulas is generally a good target. It balances out the differences between each formula's assumptions. However, the best weight for you is one where you feel healthy, have good energy, and your health markers are in a good range.
Can I convert my result to pounds or stone?
Absolutely. Since all four formulas produce results in kilograms, you can convert to pounds by multiplying the result by 2.205. For stone, divide the pound value by 14. Many people find it useful to track their target in whichever unit their scale displays.
Do these formulas account for frame size?
No, none of the four formulas factor in frame size. A person with a naturally large frame will weigh more than someone with a narrow frame at the same height and still be healthy. To estimate your frame size, measure your wrist circumference — men over 18 cm and women over 15.5 cm generally indicate a larger frame.

Related Calculators

Explore more health tools:

BMI Calculator — Check your Body Mass Index

BMR Calculator — Estimate your basal metabolic rate

TDEE Calculator — Total daily energy expenditure

Water Intake Calculator — Daily hydration goals

Body Fat Calculator — Estimate body fat percentage

Macro Calculator — Calculate your macronutrient needs